"Finding Bix: The Life and Afterlife
of a Jazz Legend"
By Brendan Wolfe.
The University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, 2017.
A Review by Albert Haim
Stony Brook, June 2017.
Introduction.
“Finding Bix” by Brendan
Wolfe is a self-centered account of the
author’s efforts to “find Bix.” A more accurate title would be “Finding
Brendan
Wolfe and the Meaning of Calathumpic.” [Note 1]. When I read a book or
an
article, the first thing I look for is a statement of purpose, either
in the
introduction or early in the text. I could not find such a statement
under the
torrent of words in “Finding Bix” until page 64 “who was Bix
Beiderbecke and
what else didn’t I know about him?” and page 74: “this mission of
searching
Bix’s personality for clues to his music.” The latter is not what I
found in
“Finding Bix.” The music is presented as an after thought and treated
in a very
superficial manner. There is a general statement of purpose in the page
for
“Finding Bix” in the
- “Bugles for Beiderbecke,” by Charles Wareing and George Garlick,
London,
1958.
- "Bix Beiderbecke" by Burnett James.,
- "Bix: Man and Legend" by
Richard M. Sudhalter and Philip R. Evans with William Dean-Myatt,
NewYork,
1974.
- "La vita e la leggenda di Bix
Beiderbecke" by Aldo Lastella,
- "Bix Beiderbecke: Sein Leben, Seine Musik, Seine
Schallplatten" by
- "Bix Beiderbecke: Jazz Age Genius" by David R. Collins,
- "Bix: The Leon Bix Beiderbecke Story"by Philip R. Evans and Linda
K. Evans,
- Countless chapters in jazz history books and articles in magazines.
- A set of set of 20 LP's, "Sincerely, Bix Beiderbecke," issued in
1988 and accompanied by a comprehensive booklet with detailed
information about
Bix’s life and music .
- A set of 12 CDs, “Bix restored” issued beginning in 1999.
- Innumerable LPS containing Bix’s
recordings and detailed information about Bix’s life and music. These
were
issued beginning in the 1950s, including the legendary set of George
Avakian’s
Columbia LPS where many current Bix admirers learned about Bix’s music.
“Finding Bix” corrects
the previous ignorance of the Bix Beiderbecke
literature, but, as explained below, some crucial pieces of information
are
still missing.
General Comments.
There is no new factual
information about Bix in
“Finding Bix.” The book consists of quotations from earlier books (both
fact
and fiction), articles, films (one a documentary, the others fiction),
postings
in social networks, private communications, many of them anonymous, and
the
author’s remarks. Bix did no leave diaries or gave interviews (except
one,
plagiarized, as detailed in “Finding Bix”). The only primary source
about Bix
consists of the letters he wrote to his family mostly in 1921-22 and a
few in
1931. There are several second-hand accounts from some of the people
who knew
Bix personally. The majority of these accounts –interviews via letters
and
telephone conversations a few decades after Bix died– come from Phil
Evans’s
50-year research about Bix. These second-hand accounts are necessarily
colored
by the passing of time and faulty recollections. Moreover, the comments
of
Bix’s fellow musicians are often anecdotes and chronological
information that
shed little light about the “essence” of Bix.
Thus, the effort
expended in “Finding Bix” (which I take it to mean to
find the real Bix) is necessarily a failure, as acknowledged by the
author
himself. The author reports what others have said about Bix in a
disorganized,
rambling, verbose, pretentious and repetitive style. But that is not
the most
serious problem with the book. To me, one of the major flaws is the
false
equivalence assigned by the author, in his efforts to “find Bix”, to
books and
articles by scholars and historians on one hand; and on the other hand,
inventions in works of fiction (books and films), casual comments from
contributors in social media/discussion groups, and private
communications,
often from unnamed individuals. The conflating of fact and fiction is a
very
serious fault that invalidates the few inferences the author draws.
I will provide a few
examples.
- In pages 142-143, the
author provides some information from the
detailed biography of Trumbauer by Evans and Kiner. Wolfe cites the
circumstances under which Goldkette hired Bix in 1926. In the second
half of
page 143, the author brings in an invented dialogue between Bix and
Tram from
the Avati’s film. If the goal is to “find Bix,” then it seems to me
that
bringing in fictional material and mixing it with fact is
counterproductive and
misleading.
- In page 154, Wolfe
cites Kraslow’s (the rental agent for Bix’s last
residence) account of Bix’s last days and then throws in a quotation
from
Turner’s fiction book “1929.” How does the quotation from a fiction
book help
“Finding Bix”?
- In page 90, Bix and
the fiction character Rick Martin in Dorothy
Baker’s novel “Young Man with a Horn” are both viewed as victims:
“Better make
Rick, like Bix, the perpetual victim.” In fact, according to Wolfe the
real
person and the fictional character are fused together as one: “Rick
will always
be Bix, and Bix will always be Rick.” It sounds good, but it is a
preposterous
proposition. If Wolfe is trying to “find Bix” he is not going to find
him in an
invented character of a novel, regardless of
how much Bix was an inspiration for Dorothy Baker to create Rick
Martin
in her novel “Young Man with a Horn.” See also page 3: “Someday when
I’m really
good, I’m gonna do things with this trumpet nobody’s ever thought of
doing,” a
wide-eyed Douglas (actor Kirk) tells Doris Day.” And later, “Poor Kirk.
I
always feel bad for him at this moment---stamps?!?--- even as I am left
wondering what part of all this is Bix and what part is legend.” Does
Wolfe
seriously expect to “find Bix’ in the words of an actor playing a
fictional
musician in a movie based on a novel?
More General Comments.
From the University of
Iowa Press webpage about
“Finding Bix”: “What follows, though, is anything but straightforward,
as Wolfe
discovers Bix Beiderbecke to be at the heart of furious and ever-timely
disputes over addiction, race and the origins of jazz, sex, and the
influence
of commerce on art. “
I will discuss each of
these topics now.
Race and the Origins of Jazz.
While Bix was alive, race in jazz was not an issue. Of course, there
was
segregation, but that was a part of life in
Sex.
Wolfe brings in two sex issues about Bix: 1. his arrest in April 1921
for
his interaction with 5-year old, visually impaired Sarah Ivens; and 2. his alleged homosexual encounter with
Ralph Berton’s older, gay brother. Bix’s arrest is first
mentioned/hinted
briefly in pages 31, 34, 62. As a matter of fact, the mention in page
34
consists of a four-line chapter!
I have the suspicion
that the brief, repetitive specification is done
for dramatic effect, with the idea of whetting the reader’s appetite. I
think
it is a cheap trick.
All details associated
with the arrest, including all extant documents
and extensive discussions have been covered ad nauseam in social
websites,
(Bixography Forum and Facebook), in Rich Johnson’s “The Davenport
Album” and in
Jean Pierre Lion’s “Bix: The Definitive Biography of a Jazz Legend.”
All Wolfe
does is rehash the available information and provide the opinions of
several
Bix scholars/aficionados, but not his own conclusions.
Just a few
clarifications. Wolfe quotes what Geoffrey Ward writes about
the arrest in his “Jazz: A History of America’s Music.” “a lewd and
lascivious
act with a child-apparently just a fellow teenager”
Evidently this is a false account. The child
was five-years old. It turns out that Ward obtained the information
about the
girl being a teenager from Phil Evans. On August 10, 2002, I reported
that
Evans had misled Ward. http://www.network54.com/Forum/27140/message/1029004042
Chapter 36, page 125
begins with an account of Bix’s arrest. But by
page 127, Ralph Berton’s alleged fling of Bix with Gene Berton is
brought in
and this is followed by a discussion of Sudhalter’s “Ominous Note.”
Then Wolfe
writes: “Sudhalter never explains how this context might shed light on
whether
Bix was gay, but it’s not difficult to connect the dots.” First, Bix’s
arrest
and Berton’s alleged fling with his gay brother Gene have nothing to do
with
each other. Wolfe acknowledges that “Whether Bix was gay, bi- or
anything else
should be irrelevant to the facts of April 22, 1921-and yet it never
has been.”
No documentation for the connection between the arrest and the fling is
presented – and I don’t know of any such connection in the Bix
literature- so
why bring the fling when discussing the arrest? Moreover, the
connection of
Sudhalter’s Ominous Endnote and an allegation of Bix being gay is
highly
misleading and perhaps dishonest: Wolfe knew the facts. He had asked
Sudhalter
in 2003 about the facts behind the “carefully husbanded documentation.”
Sudhalter’s answer was clear: he was referring to the arrest, not to
homosexuality on the part of Bix. Why the unjustified innuendo?
The last point. Wolfe
fails to report that the Ivens family returned to
Alleged Homosexual Encounter.
This comes exclusively from Ralph Berton’s “Remembering Bix.” There is
no other report. There are several mentions of the incident. First, in
another
very short chapter (chapter 21, 14 lines) which cites a “fling” and
ends with
the sentence: “Wait a minute,” he told his brother. “What do you mean
by a
fling?” Is again Wolfe presenting a bit of a preview for dramatic
effect,
without providing all of the information in one location? Another brief
mention
in page 128: “Ralph Berton’s bombshell claim that Bix had had a “fling”
with
Berton’s brother Gene.” And in page 129: “When Ralph Berton’s book was
published, the homosexual story was a big shock for Bix fans.” Finally,
in more
detail in pages 133-134, Wolfe again uses the misleading technique of
conflating reports in a pseudo-biographical account with lots of
fabrications,
Berton’s “Remembering Bix,” and a novel, Laura Mazzuca Toops “
The Influence of Commerce on Art (and
Authenticity).
This is a well
visited subject and includes the myth that Bix had “sold out” when he
accepted
Whiteman’s offer and, except for a few solos, was very unhappy because
he no
longer could play “authentic” jazz. Some of this has been debunked by
Sudhalter
and Evans in 1974 and by Evans and Kiner in 1997. Why bring it back in
2017?
Jazz snobs are always emphasizing the question of “authenticity.” What
is
unauthentic about a hot dance band recording by Jean Goldkette with
Bix? It may
not be “real jazz” according to jazz snobs, so what? We must realize
that Bix’s
career was mostly that of a dance band musician.
Bix’s Relations With His Parents.
Several Bix biographies discuss the
failure of Bix’s parents to support Bix’s decision to become a dance
band/jazz
musician. Wolfe echoes: “And his parents’ failure can be summed up
neatly in
this single anecdote (the story of the unopened records, which I cover
below).”
It is not unexpected that for Bix’s parents, an upper middle class
couple, born
and raised in the Victorian era, Bix’s chosen career as a dance
band/jazz
musician was regrettable. However, the Beiderbecke family was
close-knit and
Bix’s parents helped Bix whenever he was in need. The failure of Wolfe
to point
this out represents, in fact, a distortion. There is ample evidence of
a
genuine love in the family. Two examples will suffice.
- A letter of condolence on the occasion of the death of Bix's
grandmother. The
letter starts with "Dearest Dad" and later continues as follows
(verbatim, with errors uncorrected; underlined text is my own.) It was
written
from
- Bix spent Feb 1929 at home, recuperating from his breakdown in
"Bickie is still with us. We dread to think of his leaving because he
is
such a
peach to have around & heaven only knows when he will spend another
vacation with us.
With the exception of a slight cold he's feeling fine but believe me,
he needed
the rest he had here & I'm sure he is in the pink of condition now
to get
back into the harness.
Whiteman plays in
We dread to think of his leaving because he is such a peach to have
around & heaven only knows when he will spend another vacation with
us."
Of course, Bismark was concerned about Bix, but the above sentence is
very
revealing of the love Bismark felt for Bix. Bismark's own words about
his son
to his daughter mean a lot more than anything that anyone has ever
written
about the interaction of Bix with his parents.
Note: Whiteman played the Old Gold Hour on Apr 8 from KOL in
Why didn’t Wolfe include
these two letters in “Finding Bix.”? In my
opinion, they represent crucial documentation in any effort to “find
Bix.”
The Unopened Boxes of Records.
This has become one of the most widely
circulated stories about Bix. Wolfe appears to accept the accuracy of
the
unopened boxes of records story (pages 121-122). However, he also
reports Scott
Black’s account that the records were not Bix’s, but records by the New
Orleans
Rhythm Kings. Evans and Evans write: “Bix’s life has been filled with
many
rumors and colorful stories, none has been more damaging then the
“false” story
of his finding unopened boxes of records he had sent home over the
years.”
Moreover, considering that this story is included in most Bix
biographies and
biographical sketches, I am surprised that Wolfe does not provide more
information
and fails to analyze the story in detail in his quest to “find Bix.”
Here are
some of the missing data.
- A portion of a letter from Bruce Foxman to Phil Evans dated March 10,
11 1964
in which Bruce tells Evans the result of his interview of Esten
Spurrier. Here
are the exact words from Bruce's letter to Phil. The account is
slightly
different than what Spurrier told Sudhalter in
- There is a letter from
Bix’s brother to Evans. Charles B. Beiderbecke
(12/4/59) totally dismissed this story: "Bix never did send home any
test
pressings or recordings."
- There is another fact
to be taken into consideration. Bix’s brother,
beginning in 1925, was the manager of the Victrola division of the
Harned and
Von Maur Store in
It seems to me that
Wolfe, in his efforts to “find Bix,” should have
analyzed the whole question of the unplayed records and/or unopened
boxes of
records more thoroughly and provide any conclusions he might have
reached..
A Few Detailed Comments.
- Page 17. “Rich
Johnson, a tall and ornery Bixophile.” A gratuitous
and patently false comment about one of the nicest guys in the world of
Bix.
Rich got along very easily with everyone. In the world of Bixophiles,
where
personal enmities are common, Rich was a notable exception. He even got
along
with some of the nastiest Bixophiles.
- Page
166. "Chris Barry in
pursuit of the piano..." That is incorrect. Chris's discovery of the
true
identity of Alice Weiss O'Connell had nothing to do with the piano.
Chris wrote
in the Bixography Forum in April 2009: " it would seem that Bix
inadvertently had the name associations reversed. By that I mean Weiss
was
- Pages 32-33 and 78-81.
Wolfe often treats a subject in installments.
Here is another example. First cited and discussed briefly in pages
32-33 and
then in more detail in pages 78-81, readers will find what I can only
describe
as a pompous and overblown analysis of Gregory Elbaz’s graphic novel
“Bix.” I
wonder how a surreal graphic novel can help the author “find Bix.”
Wolfe
mentions me twice in the pages cited above. 1. “Perhaps flipping
through is all
Albert Haim did.” Perhaps, Wolfe has no idea of how I looked at the
book. 2.
"Albert Haim is bloody Saint Giles protecting his poor beast from the
slings and arrows of vulgar men." “Bloody Saint Giles”? Bix, my “poor
beast”? My understanding is that Saint Giles was the patron of beggars
and
cripples, certainly a totally inadequate description of Bix. Moreover,
I do not
consider myself a Bix protector, but a Bix researcher who tries to
dispel
incorrect information and to express his opinion of all things related
to Bix
in a direct manner.
- This is irrelevant to
the subject of Bix and is admittedly
nitpicking. But as a teacher for nearly 50 years and an admirer of
Jorge Luis
Borges, I find the following error offensive. In page 6, Wolfe writes
“If this
were Borges, there might be talk of el asombro or la sagrada horror.”
Horror in
Spanish is a masculine noun; the correct form is “el sagrado horror.”
- Wolfe quotes Scott Black in pages
171-172: "There were no test pressings [that Bix was supposed to have
sent home to his parents."] The Institute of Jazz Studies has one
such test pressing with Bix's mother inscription.
The Coda. The
Culmination of the Book?
The Coda covers a lot of
unrelated subjects. Written in a disjointed manner, it fails to provide
an
appreciation of the most important aspect of Bix’s life: his remarkable
and
long-lasting music.
The coda begins with the
description of a (somewhat nauseating, in my
opinion) "reenactment of Bix and Hoagy's hot night listening to The
Firebird" in Barbara Wascher’s room in the Marriott, Tribute to Bix,
First, Wolfe mentions a
commotion in the “spinning room.”At this point
the negative comments about me begin to pile up:
What Wolfe has done is
highly unethical: Wolfe quotes the individual
who proposed the murder of Haim in
The Coda continues with
the interview, the morning after the Stravinsky
experiment, of an anonymous Bixophile. Wolfe reports, among other
things, the
Bixophile’s reaction to Bix’s arrest. He also throws in the unjustified
remark
that Rich Jonhson “was completely and totally in love with Bix.”
Then, Wolfe goes into
excruciating detail about what Barb told him
about The Firebird, throwing in, out of context, the names of Sarah
Ivens
(Bix’s arrest) and Gene Berton (the alleged fling with Bix). The
chronology of
events is confusing. As I understand it, there is a flaw:
- First the Firebird listening thing.
- Then the passage transcribed above.
- Then the interview of the unnamed individual (next morning).
- Then back to the Firebird thing the night before where "I was
depressed
but also strangely energized by the things the Bixophile had said [the
next
morning]."
The Bottom Line.
Individuals who know
little or nothing about Bix are not going to find in "Finding Bix"
objective information about his life and music. I venture to guess
that, if they have the patience to go through the book, most will be
turned away from Bix. Wolfe may have found himself, but surely he did
not recruit new Bixophiles.
Albert Haim, Stony
Brook, June 2017.
Note [1] There are six
mentions of the word calathumpic in “Finding Bix.”